Clean Warm Up Music Basketball

CASSAZIONE: 6 MONTHS OF HARASSMENT AND' harassment, employers responsible if there is not

ROME (Sept. 12) - six months of harassment may be enough because it's the offense of harassment and the employer is liable unless he intervenes with concrete measures to protect the victim from the oppression of his superior. To settle and the Supreme (Case 22858) that an employee who has reason to complain all the abuse received from his supervisor for six months without the employer had interfered complained. Harassment. Elizabeth F., Capgemini Italy of Turin, in six months, from February to July, had been subjected to a long series of harassment: the relocation (from Turin in La Spezia), the removal of a project until the relevant European location in a windowless room, reserved for external collaborators, and deprived of their own desk and a wardrobe. All reconstructs the ruling of the Supreme Court, dressed in the 'coarse jokes "that Elizabeth felt again by his boss (" I've broken the c. .., you got it bad str .. gotta do what I tico). Action rejected. The woman asked the Court to order the employer to more than € 400 000 as compensation for damages. But both the Court and the Court of Appeal of Turin (November 2004) had rejected his appeal, arguing that a period of "six months" was "too small for the realization of a process of bullying." Piazza Cavour instead upheld the appeal and noted that "it is true that bullying can not be achieved through a pipeline snapshot, it is also true that a period of six months is more than sufficient to establish the suitability of conduct detrimental over time ' . The liability of the employer. The Supreme Court stressed that "to exclude the liability of the employer when the harassment comes from an employee placed in a position of dominance hierarchy than the victim, is not sufficient merely a late-intervention peacemaker not followed by concrete measures and surveillance, and indeed potentially unarmed in front of an open violation of the assurances given by the alleged mobbing. "You will now apppello the Court of Genoa, where the Supreme Court referred the case to "apply" the principles set forth by the Supreme Court and ordered the employer.

http://www.ilmessaggero.it/articolo.php?id=30917&sez=HOME_INITALIA